The newly single man has put his ex-fiancée’s wedding ceremony costume up on the market on Fb Market after a breakdown of their relationship – and everyone seems to be saying the identical factor

Video loading

Video Unavailable

The video will auto-play quicklyeighthCancel

play now

TikToker finds scorned man promoting ex-fiancée’s wedding ceremony costume

There’s nothing worse than a bitter break-up, particularly when it occurs half means by way of planning your wedding ceremony.

A scorned man has put his ex-fiancée’s wedding ceremony costume up on the market on Fb Market, saying it is good for a “low cost slapper”.

Including a price ticket of simply £5, the person explains how he dodged a bullet after presumably catching his associate dishonest earlier than exchanging rings.

His advert reads: “Marriage ceremony costume – would match a bigger woman, fairly chavvy in model so would swimsuit an inexpensive slapper.

“Had a fortunate escape so it is model new which is greater than could be mentioned for the supposed wearer’s well-worn vagina.

For extra of the information you care about, straight to your inbox, join certainly one of our day by day newsletters right here.

He listed it for simply £5



Everyone seems to be saying the identical factor



“It is a dimension 12 I feel – she was susceptible to mendacity so it is probably a 14/16.”

Including insult to damage, he merely titled the merchandise as “wedding ceremony costume – dimension fats”, so when folks come to seek for finances robes on-line, they’re met together with his commercial.

Commenting on the submit, one Fb consumer mentioned: “Probably one of many funniest issues I’ve seen listed on market place.”

One other added: “One thing tells me he is by no means going to promote this costume.”

A 3rd mentioned: “OMG. I am guessing she cheated then yeah take a look at the sale submit!”

It comes after a bride was accused of being a “bridezilla” after banning her seven-year-old flower woman from carrying a white costume to her wedding ceremony.

The girl states she did not wish to be “upstaged” by her future niece on her huge day, regardless of her being only a youngster.

She mentioned on Reddit : “We had determined to make my future niece the flower woman. She’s about to show seven, is the sweetest little woman, and I assumed the function would swimsuit her completely.

Bride shamed for demanding skilled photographer works for 1990s costs Boss below hearth for sending ‘ridiculous’ electronic mail after three workers resign

“For sure, her mum authorised, and he or she was ecstatic once I requested the each of them if they’d be keen to tackle this function.”

To assist with group, the bride-to-be created a marriage group chat for feminine company, offering them with a spot to debate their outfit choices.

She added: “Her mum posted an image of a small pure white costume within the chat, saying that it was for her daughter.

“I actually wasn’t okay with this in any capability. I feel carrying white to a marriage is cheesy, and may very well be taken the improper means – like attempting to upstage the bride.

“So, I privately messaged my future sister-in-law and requested her to perhaps take a look at different choices, like perhaps a light-weight pastel blue or pink, or one thing of the like.

“Nonetheless, she instructed me that her daughter is actually into the white costume, and that she actually loves it, and it is actually only a costume, and should not be an enormous deal.

“Plus, it should not even hassle me, as a result of nobody ought to see it as upstaging, contemplating she’s actually a toddler.”

Regardless of agreeing with a lot of her future sister-in-law’s factors and acknowledging flower women historically put on white, the bride-to-be put her foot down and banned the seven-year-old from carrying the costume.

“She has taken the time to achieve out to me a number of instances to try to persuade me to alter my stance, saying that her daughter could be heartbroken if she could not put on the costume, they’ve each fallen in love with it,” she mentioned.

“My reply each time has been a agency no.

“I’ve instructed my fiancé about this and he received upset with me, telling me about how I used to be making an enormous fuss over a toddler’s costume color, and that this actually does not matter within the grand scheme of issues in any respect.”

Have you ever received a narrative to share? We wish to hear all about it. E-mail us at [email protected]

learn extra

Indignant mums kick off when somebody edits their ‘no canines’ signal to one thing a lot ruder

learn extra

Girl spends hundreds at vets after husband blames his farts on the canine


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here